During the
1950s and 1960s, the Triumph motorcycle company liked to boast that it built “the
best motorcycle in the world.” Many
agreed. The Triumph company was the most profitable of any in the British
motorcycle industry, with sales particularly strong in the lucrative North
American export market.
Much of the
credit for that success can be attributed to Edward Turner, the company’s
Managing Director between 1936 and 1956, who thereafter was elevated to the
board of directors of BSA, the huge Birmingham-based engineering conglomerate that
had owned Triumph since 1951.
Turner, who had
a notoriously mercurial, even irascible, temperament, nonetheless possessed a
keen sense of what his company’s customers wanted. As he once famously put it, the
motorcycle market was determined by the tastes of “fashionable young men.” Turner, better than anyone else, knew how
to cater to those tastes.
Starting with
the ground-breaking 1937 500cc Triumph “Speed Twin,” one of the most
influential motorcycle designs of all time, through to the dazzling 1959 650cc “Bonneville,”
Turner presided over a string of commercial hits for his company.
To most of the
motorcycling public, the dashing and sometimes charismatic Turner was one of
the few recognisable personalities amongst the largely faceless, publicity-shy leaders
of that industry. Indeed, at least
in the English-speaking world, he is one of the very few managers of any
motorcycle company to rate a full-length biography.[1]
Consequently,
one might wonder how Winter’s book adds to our
knowledge of Turner and, by extension, the British motorcycle industry.
In fact, Mr.
Winter, a lawyer by profession and a long-time motorcycle enthusiast, has
written an interesting book, in equal parts a travelogue, biography, and
company history, but also one based on an original premise.
In October
1953, Turner, together with Alex St. John Masters and Robert Fearon, two
other senior Triumph company managers, staged a publicity stunt, the so-called “Gaffer’s
Gallop.”[2]
Using 150cc “Terrier”
machines, which were set to debut at the Earl’s Court Motorcycle Show in London
later that month, the three riders rode a total of 1,008 miles from Land’s End
in Cornwall, the most southern point in Britain, up to John O’Groats in
Scotland, the nation’s northern extremity.
In doing so,
they demonstrated that, while small, the Terrier was reliable, reasonably fast,
and capable of travelling long distances. These were all important virtues at a time when large numbers of Italian
scooters and German mopeds were pouring into Britain.
Stunt or not,
the ride gained much valuable publicity for Triumph and the Terrier went on to
become one of the more successful of the smaller economy motorcycles produced
by the British industry.
In June 2007, Winter followed in the path of the three gaffers to see how
things had changed in Britain over the 54 years since Turner’s journey. However, by contrast, he rode a 1995
900cc Triumph “Thunderbird” and, constrained by a slim bank account, spent his
nights in campgrounds along the way, instead of the often palatial hotels and
inns favoured by Turner and his colleagues during their 1953 “Gallop.”
All this gives
Winter an opportunity to use his book to comment on wider themes surrounding
British social history, but also more particularly on the contrast between the
comparatively uncrowded roads of 1953 and the
congested world of the early twenty-first century. The book’s focus shifts backwards and
forwards, between the 1953 “Gallop” and Winter’s later
journey.
By and large, Winter’s approach works. He writes in an engaging manner, has an
eye for detail and a sense of humour. However, he does run into trouble with some of his reflections on the
downfall of the industry during the late 1960s and early 1970s.
Turner was gone
from the scene by then, having stepped down from the BSA board in 1964. Without him, Winter speculates, the industry really began to falter.
Winter points
his finger at a wide variety of culprits. They include number-crunching, flow-chart
obsessed managers, corporate asset-strippers, and truculent “bully boy” trade
unions.
Winter seems
especially critical of the new professional managers who succeeded Turner. They
contemptuously dismissed the ideas of the largely self-taught engineers (like
many of his contemporaries, Turner had virtually no post-secondary education)
who were largely responsible for the industry’s success in favour of pursuing
designs of their own that motorcycle consumers didn’t want.
This is already
a well-known point of view, one best expressed by Bert Hopwood, one of Turner’s
colleagues, in his memoirs published back in the early 1980s.[3]
The problem is
that, in his defense of indigenous talent found in factories like the Triumph
plant near Coventry, Winter fails to offer an alternative—what strategy
should have been followed to stop the successive waves of Japanese imports
which devastated British market share, first in North America and then later in
Britain and Europe?
More
particularly, he praises Turner for a warning he gave to his fellow BSA
directors about dangers of potential future foreign competition following a
visit to Japan in 1959. However,
the fact is that Turner, who was then probably the single most influential
figure in the British motorcycle industry, subsequently did nothing to follow
up on his own warning. Indeed,
instead he went into semi-retirement, likely caused by growing ill health, and failed
to propose strategies for countering their burgeoning Japanese rivals before he
died in 1973.
Finally,
although Winter’s book includes a bibliography, the
endnotes are frustratingly incomplete. One, for example, merely reads “National Geographic magazine,” a
reference of little help to his readers. Even worse, for a book so full of information about Turner and the glory
days of the British motorcycle industry, there is no index.
Notes